Access
Who reaches the programme, referral routes and whether funded places reduce practical or financial barriers.
Community wellbeingIMPACT & LEARNING
We want participants, partners and funders to understand what a programme delivered, who it reached and what changed.
Our approach combines human feedback with proportionate outcome evidence while protecting dignity, privacy and informed choice.
WHAT WE LOOK AT
Measures are agreed before delivery and adapted to the programme. We do not present wellbeing support as a guaranteed clinical outcome.
Who reaches the programme, referral routes and whether funded places reduce practical or financial barriers.
Attendance, completion and the points at which people choose to pause or leave a programme.
Proportionate pre- and post-programme feedback on stress, rest, sleep, clarity and confidence.
Whether participants felt informed, respected, safe and able to make choices throughout delivery.
THE LEARNING CYCLE
OUR EVIDENCE PRINCIPLES
Participant voice helps decide which questions are useful and which would create unnecessary burden.
Measures are selected for the programme, population and funding purpose—not collected simply because they can be.
Partner reporting uses aggregated or anonymised information unless a lawful, clearly explained basis requires otherwise.
Evidence should change delivery. We record improvements, unmet needs and decisions made in response.
REPORTING COMMUNITY BENEFIT
Programme reporting may include reach, attendance, participant feedback, agreed outcome measures, learning and recommendations. The level of reporting is agreed with each delivery or funding partner.
As the CIC develops and sufficient evidence becomes available, this page will publish public-facing impact updates. Until then, we will distinguish clearly between intended outcomes, early learning and verified results.